[Thinking] Instant Controversy.

I don't usually like a controversy. It maybe same with why I don't like to do freestyle rapping. Nowadays, people tend to argue instantly. In special, instant controversy usually happens on line and drinking place. In such controversy, they seems to show off their improvised talking skills. Is there some thoughtful things?

Is it enjoyment? Next day, people stop it with just a reason, "I don't wanna think about it anymore". There are some more excuses such as "for maintaining freindship or relationship", "nothing left to say about it". Are they able to say all their arguements in instant 1hour? Then I have to definite it as enjoyment, even if they were really serious last night...

Improvisation... In early days, the concept of freestyle rapping in hiphop was based on improvised lylics when they got inspiration. They wrote down their inspirations on paper and rapped it on stage. Nowadays... hiphop mind was spoilt. People likely to see someone on a stage freestyle rap similar quality of recorded rapping. Even they moved it to battle format! Much before, some genius musician like Beethoven or Chopin imporvised in some non-official place.
But, how can freestyle rapper argue and twist others with non thoughtful thinking? So how can masses assnt resistancy spilit of hip-hop, if there's only unbounded voice? Plus, Yo-Yo Ma has seldom improvised in public on his cello.

Back to the controversy... The most important thing in controversy is to learn more and develop ourselves not to defeat other. I'm not talking about academic controversy. One more suggestion is.. you should rather be stubborn than make peace. Instant peacemaking after instant controversy is desecration of the the controversy. We are not genius, also we don't know about all elements which can be issue on unpredictable controversy. Why u guys never bend ur neck to other's opinion?

...To such crap keyboard worriers and drunken debaters.

Are they improvisers? Their controversy is thoughfully written and
revised before showing... But audiences simply accept their arguements as improvising and practice it in real life.